Three fluors one PMT

There persists a misconception that if things are measured in the same channel, they are the same color or “close enough”. The example that I’ll use to illustrate the potential problems with this was a panel that used BV510 and V500 as the labels for the dump channel markers, and Live/Dead Aqua for viability, which are all measured off of 405 excitation and a bandpass around 525/50.  You can see in the image below that they are all slightly different:

3Fluors1

http://www.biolegend.com/spectraanalyzer  A quick aside:

thankyou

On our system, we have the following detectors on our violet laser.  Shown are the uncompensated signals from the 3 different dyes on single stained beads.

3Fluors2

If you compensate based on V500, you can see the other parameters are not properly compensated in all channels:

3Fluors3

Compensating based on BV510:

3Fluors4

And Live/Dead Aqua:

3Fluors5

The cytometer has no way to tell WHICH dye is generating the signal, so it will not be able to correct the signals properly, but will just apply whatever values your matrix contains.  The actual matrix values for the different dyes:

3Fluors6

If you still decide to mix fluors, in this case (viability combined with a dump channel) I would use the Live/Dead dye to determine compensation. ALL cells will be stained with the L/D dye (dead cells will be brightest) so errors in compensation will affect your populations of interest. For a dump channel you are keeping the negative cells so even if compensation isn’t quite right, it should not affect your cells of interest.

Note that a similar situation can occur if you use a tandem dye for your dump channel–the tandem for each different antibody may be slightly different, so your compensation may not be correct for all markers.

This entry was posted in Compensation, Setup. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Three fluors one PMT

  1. Ruth says:

    I am also thankful that Biolegend has phycoerythrin listed as PE instead of R-PE, which I would never think to look for and causes me to look stupid in front of clients when I am attempting to show them the spectra… Bookmarking the Biolegend site NOW!

    The visuals in your explanation are very convincing – hope folks will heed the warning!

  2. mwaring708 says:

    There are a bunch of other spectraviewers linked above under Helpful Links>Spectraviewers, as not every spectraviewer (not even Biolegend’s!) has every spectra:
    https://newenglandcytometry.com/cytometry-related-links/spectraviewers/
    If there are any suggestions for others to add please send them to me!

  3. Pingback: FACS Pain | New England Cytometry

Leave a Reply to mwaring708 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s