Compensation caution: matching beads

Other platforms may be different, but with BD’s Diva software you can only collect one “unstained” compensation control, so if it is necessary to mix what type of compensation particle you are using (cells for PI or DAPI, Arc beads for Live/Dead amine reactive dyes, rat comp bead or mouse comp bead for antibody from rat or mouse) you would have to define a different negative population for each type to get proper compensation.  In Diva, this is done by having an internal negative in the data file, and drawing a new interval gate on the histogram for that single stained control.  In the absence of this additional gate, the software refers to the “unstained control” tube for the comparison.
     At certain points in manufacturing, companies must change the batch of plastic they use for their bead, and the new batch can have different  fluorescence properties in some channels, especially in the 450nm emission range with 405 excitation (the “Pacific Blue” channel). If you mix your lot numbers of beads, you may get a mismatch. In this plot an older vial of “non-binding” bead is mixed with a newer vial (later expiration date) of unstained binding bead and you can clearly see the difference in intensity:
beadmismatch
When you add an antibody to this mix which is known to have no spillover into Pacific Blue (such as PerCP-Cy5.5) you still see a separation in the populations. The software is going to look at the positive population (green) and compare the mean signal for that population to the mean signal of the negative population (blue) in Pacific Blue, and since the positive is higher, this difference is attributed to spectral overlap and a compensation value is determined even though there is no fluorescence spillover, it is just a difference in the plastic.
compbead
If compensation is calculated in this case, any time you have PerCP-Cy5.5+ events, there will be signal inappropriately subtracted from the Pacific Blue channel.  On the left is the wrong compensation, on the right is compensation calculated with properly-matched beads.
comp mismatch

This was a 4 color experiement so the error was easy to notice, but in more complex panels this will not be the case, so make sure you do it right from the start!

I posted to on the Purdue message board about this a while back, here is the link towards the end of the thread with the previous messages attached, start at the bottom to go through the discussion chronologically.

https://lists.purdue.edu/pipermail/cytometry/2011-April/041298.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Full Disclosure: I did not receive any Compensation for this post…

In flow cytometry it seems the biggest source of confusion and angst is compensation.  As a first post, I’m going to re-publish a post I did elsewhere.

Compensation is somewhat tricky if you don’t understand the process. There are lots of good online tutorials and posts about compensation, but there are a few specific items I’d like to address and have “published” for viewing so I’ll throw my hat in the ring as well.

All fluorochromes will emit light across a range of wavelenghts, and if you are trying to take measurements for another fluor in a band that is included in this range, you will get background light (“spillover” or “spectral overlap”) from that other fluorochrome. To correct for this, most cytometry systems have some mechanism for “compensation” to remove this background. In essence, for any other parameter/detector  that you are measuring, you want your single positive population to have the same Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) as the negative population so that any positive signal in the other channels can be attributed to that particular color, and is not spillover from something else. In the case shown, FITC signal is being detected in the PE channel, and once compensated has the same mean fluorescence in the PE channel as the unstained.

Many companies now offer antibody-capture bead kits for compensation (Invitrogen, BD, Bangs Labs, Spherotech) and they usually include a “binding bead” and “non binding bead” in the same box. For example, BD offers “Compbeads” which bind to a specific species’ IgG (mouse, rat, hamster), so for a mouse-anti-Human CD4 antibody, you’d need the mouse binding bead, but for a rat-anti-mouse CD19 you’d need the rat binding bead. For Invitrogen’s ARC beads which are used to compensate their amine-reactive Live/Dead fixable stains, the binding beads are coated with amine groups so the reactive dye will bind to the bead. The Live/Dead dye will NOT bind to antibody-capture beads.

In order to correctly do this calculation, it is critical that you are comparing particles of the same type– if you are using stained cells, you want to compare the signals to the *same type* of unstained cells. If you are using beads, you want to compare to the exact same unstained bead. The “non-binding” bead is included in the kits for this purpose-they are the same bead as the binding one in the kit, but will not stain with the reagent and thus remain negative. You can include them both in the same tube, although you should wash the beads after staining to remove free dye if you do so.

Mismatches in your positive and negative particles will result in compensation errors, which could dramatically impact your data. More on that later…  Mike

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Welcome …

To New England Cytometry’s new website!

Posted in admin | 1 Comment